It Hasta be Shasta
My most recent post (A Show of Hands) certainly woke up some of the usual suspects, and although it was not my intention to spark such impassioned rebuttal, it is comforting to realize that there are some who actually take the earth and its processes seriously. Thank you!
While the science of earthquake prediction may remain frustratingly out of reach, we DO know how to predict a looming volcanic eruption. Maybe not down to the minute, but close enough to get ourselves, and any portable infrastructure, out of the way — assuming the warnings are recognized and acted upon.
Before we jump in, please feel free to refer to the following for a bit of background (and follow the links as needed):
• Click here for an index to blog posts related to volcanoes.
• Click here for an Introduction to Volcanism.
• Click here for a discussion of mafic vs. felsic igneous compositions.
• Click here for an index to blog posts related to earthquakes.
• Click here for a discussion of tectonics along the west coast of the United States.
Anyway, we may be over-matched when it comes to predicting temblors, but how’s this for an all-too-realistic scenario with regard to volcanoes?

We learned all about harmonic tremors from the lead-up to the eruption of Mt. St. Helens in 1980. It’s safe to say that at the time we may have not have fully understood the reality of what they foreshadowed, but we sure do give them more respect now! Click here for an earlier post on these swarms of mini-quakes that are a somewhat accurate — although not foolproof — predictor.
So…. What’s gonna happen when Mt. Shasta, for example, starts to show the recognizable signs of an imminent eruption?

To put this into some regional perspective, Mt. Shasta is one of the active volcanic peaks of the Cascade Range in the Pacific Northwest. In case you were wondering: Yes, the Cascades are considered active by anyone who thinks in earthtime, and will remain active as long as spreading along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge continues to shove the North American Plate westward, where it collides with the plates that comprise the oceanic crust beneath the Pacific Ocean; in this case along the Cascadia Subduction Zone.
So here comes Shasta — stretching like a tomcat after a brief nap, and quivering with harmonic tremors, with maybe even some preliminary venting of steam and ash to clear the pipes in anticipation of the main event. How should we react?
Well, the initial step would seem to be clear. Like at Mt. St. Helens, the Powers That Be will need to set up and evacuate a “Red Zone” in the hopes of minimizing the local and regional casualties, and other effects. This would of a necessity involve moving out the residents and limiting access.
(Fun Fact about a Red Zone: A couple weeks after the main eruption at St. Helens, my partner and I were sitting at a construction stop along Hwy. 197 in eastern Oregon and happened to see ash from several smaller eruptions expand across the northern horizon. The next day we drove up the Toutle, around the Red Zone barricade, and got as far as we could before being stopped by a washed-out bridge. Dave was shagging golf balls towards the remains of the mountain while I was watching rocks float down the river, when the dudes with the flashing lights on their truck arrived. As a registered geologist, I managed to sweet-talk us out of the $10,000 fine with which they threatened us — assuming we could beat them back to the road block — but it was a near thing.)
At St. Helens, it became pretty obvious (see the image of the Northern Bulge, above) that it was going to be a flank eruption, as opposed to a summit blast like the one that turned Mt. Mazama into Crater Lake. But there are no guarantees that Shasta will offer us such an obvious indicator of direction. If that remains the case throughout the early rounds, the Powers will need to be proactive everywhere… especially downstream.

So, what’s downstream? Well, the headwaters of the Sacramento River are up by Mt. Shasta, and the drainage extends down past Sacramento to the Delta and from there dumps into the San Francisco Bay. Following the course of the river are two major transportation arteries: Interstate-5, and the main north-south railway.
Once Shasta begins showing signs of an eruption, the guys in charge are going to have to close both the railroad and I-5, each of which is critical for the movement of people, goods, and services along the west coast. Let’s ignore the railroad for now (although its disruption may be an equally devastating hit in the long run), and focus on the interstate highway, which runs through Washington, Oregon, and California, linking Canada with Mexico.
When in place and operational, this road allows someone to get, for example, from Portland, Oregon to the LA basin, in one very long day of driving. But, if I-5 is closed, that route will no longer be available. And they WILL have to close it as far south as Sacramento and Stockton (or at least restrict the usage). One of the things that these types of volcanic eruptions produce — along with the shock waves and pyroclastic clouds and lava flows — are lahars.

A lahar is a volcanic mudflow that can flood downstream for a great distance, and cause all sorts of grief for those who get it its way, including massive loss of life and property. The lahar from Mt. St. Helens, for example, extended the whole way to the Columbia River, where I heard it dumped so much of Helen’s pulverized summit into the river that they had to bring in dredges so the ships stranded in Portland could get back to the Pacific.
Mt. Shasta — at 14,179 feet in elevation — has year-round snow and ice, and there will definitely be a lahar that will flow down the Sacramento River to San Francisco Bay. Imagine how much more exciting this part will be if the eruption happens in late-winter during the time of maximum snowpack…
(As an aside: The blue lake with several fingers just downstream from Shasta on the inset regional map, above, is Lake Shasta. If you were governor of California, would you drain the lake once the harmonic tremors start (and risk the multi-billion-dollar agriculture industry that relies on that water for irrigation) in the hopes of catching the bulk of the lahar, and thereby hopefully save the lower Sacramento River and S.F. Bay? Either way it’ll probably be a no-win decision: drain the lake and the state’s harvest may suffer and die. Don’t drain the lake and the displaced water will only add to the lahar. Governor? Not a hat I’d wanna wear.)
Let’s close the circle on our bedtime story: Pretend you live in Portland and want to take the kids to Disneyland. If the interstate is closed south of Mt. Shasta, your “one very long day of driving” just turned into two, or maybe even three, very long days of driving.
Now, the quickest and safest way to make the trip will be to take I-5 south to Grants Pass, Oregon, head through town to Highway 199, and then take that to Highway 101 in Crescent City. Be sure to stop at Dutch Bros (or the Human Bean) on the way by for some caffeine: you’re gonna need it. If you aren’t familiar with Hwy. 199, I am, and cannot even begin to imagine re-routing all of the I-5 traffic — trucks and Winnebago’s and all — onto that twisting, two-lane monstrosity that winds along the Smith River.
South of Crescent City it doesn’t get much better. Highway 101 wanders south through the coast range and what’s left of the redwoods until you finally hit San Francisco Bay. Unfortunately, there will be no way to get back to I-5 quite yet — they’ll have to close those roads as well because any massive eruption of Mt. Shasta would likely be devastating to the upper bay (“Better safe than sorry” will be the mantra of the year).
So, your only option would be to cross the Golden Gate Bridge (another traffic jam I have a tough time imagining), and stay on 101 until you get far enough south of the bay area to slide back over to the interstate (Hwy. 162 out of Gilroy would likely be your earliest reasonable route). Once you get back to I-5, you can resume your trip south to Disneyland. Be sure to give my best to Mickey and Minnie when you get there (and don’t forget to remove the gags from your kids’ mouths).
(Yes, I know: it would be possible to cross the Cascades from Eugene or Medford and eventually link up with Hwy. 395 that runs south on the east side of the Sierra. It’ll still take you two to three days (and possibly even four, depending on fate and fortune), but you’ll be able to skip going through San Francisco and Los Angeles, and come into D-Land from the northeast. Maybe take this route on your way home.)

Wanna have even more fun? Shift the scenario north to Mt. Rainier and consider the effect on the four and a half million people who live and work around Puget Sound (including Orting and Pike Place Market).
Mayor of Seattle? Not a hat I’d wanna wear…
Is it too much to imagine a Robert Wells 9.0 earthquake off Eureka (comment from previous article) occurring simultaneously with your Mt. Shasta scenario since the two might be distantly related through a subterranean plumbing system?
Travelers—if anyone is still able to travel—would certainly have to then take that eastern route.
Btw, I—er, ‘Dave’ was not shagging golf balls. He used a 3-wood and DROVE those balls right down St.Helens’ new throat.
As I understand it:
You are absolutely correct that there is linkage at depth between earthquakes along the Cascadia and the volcanic vents above deeper portions of the plate boundary. What hasn’t been demonstrated with any degree of certainty (at least as far as I have seen) is that activity in one portion of the system will lead directly to activity in another. Sure: the quakes and volcanoes are related, but a 9.0 in Eureka will not necessarily lead directly to an eruption of Shasta (or Lassen).
Could it? Of course — rarely is the 1st Law of GeoFantasy more germane — it just isn’t a slam dunk that one will lead “simultaneously” to the other.
Down her throat? To quote C-3PO: “How rude…”
Ooo. This geo-disaster speculation is fun and scary at the same time! I’m guilty of it. Way more fun than actually dealing with actual big bugaboos which we have actual control over. There’s a number of pressing issues right now that do not get addressed, even though they are predictable. Let’s not be bothered by any kind of thing that we can actually predict – like climate change, acidification of oceans, highly skewed distribution of wealth, or the rise of fascism. Doing something about these these gets in the way of certain peoples’ cash flow. Can’t have that.
Color me guilty also of fiddling while Rome burns. What a glorious day it was yesterday, cross country skiing on very kick-and-glidable spring snow on the Cascade crest, while the giants below are temporarily sleeping. The highways to get there are built over a jagged fresh basalt flows from cute cinder cones only a couple thousand years old. The scoria is mined for road materials at Little Nash. The lava field totals about 0.3 cubic mile of volume, all by itself. This is just a miniscule part of the subduction zone picture geoman so effectively elucidates.
Yep. I’m actually mind-mapping a post on the differences between scoria and pumice (as well as scoriumice and pumoria, depending on where you are with the intermediate compositions).
In my windy fashion I tell a story below involving earthquakes (1993 Klamath Falls), volcanics, uncertainty, and mining – It probably strikes a lot of people as odd that geologists get paid to be such vague, evasive predictors or non-predictors. And that we teach budding geologists to be humble about predictions. It’s the nature of the game.
Geology is not anything like designing an electrical circuit, designing a rocket or a car, or carpentry, or counting beans,… Saying we don’t know or we are not sure is a feature, not a bug. We commonly say we can decrease uncertainty by gathering data thoughtfully (and expensively). I got paid to predict the location and concentration of gold in deposits that had already been found, and to design open pit and underground mines based on that prediction and predicted economic criteria. It took very large amounts of expensive data to do my job, and a whole bunch of uncertainty still remained – scientific, engineering, and economic factors. Here’s a story involving earthquakes, volcanics, engineering, uncertainty, and mining:
In 1993, I was working on gold reserves and mine design for an existing open pit hard rock gold mine in northern California. As chance would have it, you might remember, a couple of Magnitude 6 tremors hit up by Klamath Falls. They knocked down one of our little inactive waste dumps – slid down the hill, not hurting anything. But we worried about our big tall active dump’s stability. Most dumps sit at angle of repose as they are being built, meaning they can be subject to failure if conditions change or if built on an unstable substrate. So I took our 3D geology data and topo maps to a geotechnical professor. We even drilled some new holes for geotech. He figured out that the little dump failed because it loaded a hillside that was underlain by a slimy layer of altered tuff (altered to a swelling clay called montmorillonite or smectite) which dipped in the downhill direction. This same layer ran under our big dump, which was the only place our permitting allowed us to dump. So, trying to be responsible, we tried to mitigate the risk by relocating the dumping point much lower down the face of the dump to create a buttress to “reinforce” it by loading the toe of it where the clay layer outcropped. You may remember that winter as very snowy, so alot of our waste was sopping wet – not good.
Anyway, not only did the dump fail, but the rock under it failed – this time on a deeper clay layer we had not drilled to. The dump lowered its potential energy without the assistance of an earthquake. A light plant sitting at the butt dump area was still standing cattywumpus, but was ~2000 feet down the new, jumbled up hillside. Smectite was rolled up at the slide’s toe like a rug pushed up against a wall. (You can’t make this stuff up.) Luckily, it happenned when trucks weren’t dumping. I went to see chattery skid marks where an 85 ton truck slammed on his brakes just before driving off into smectite oblivion. We had a lotta ‘splaining to do to the forest service. Also, that winter was bigger than the 100+ year precipitation event criterion used to design the cyanide leach pad, so there was a very dilute cyanide release to ‘splain too.
We altered the mine design, and altered it further when we found out the predicted higher grade ore could not be selected using open pit mining methods, even though the high grade was actually present. I participated in a $100 million writedown of the project, we shuttered the mill, and the company I worked for was taken over in hostile fashion five years later. The mine became heap leach only. I felt lucky to have not been the guy behind the original mine design, but it could have been me – and I was good at what I did
Yes, the uncertainty factor in any geological work is both a blessing and a curse. If interested, check out the following link to my response to a question about this that came on my educational website several years ago:
http://homework.uoregon.edu/mstrick/AskGeoMan/geoQuerry15.html
Weird. Took me three tries to get there through some kind of security issue, but got to it. You’re ahead of me, and much more succinct. I tried college teaching for four years and wasn’t any good at it, and I don’t think having internet tools would have made me any better. The links off that page wouldn’t work – just messages …”not secure”…
Your example of squeezing of rocks (peridotite under upper mantle P-T) is something I actually did as undergrad. Even given the un-naturally high strain rate, we did reproduce naturally occurring crystal fabric. The experiments were plagued by problems with very uneven temperatures across the samples. The thermocouple necessary to detect and regulate sample temperature was a big heat sink.